[Further development of regional early care-Many roads lead to Rome : Developmental stages of four established rheumatological early care concepts in different regions of Germany]. / Regionale Frühversorgung weiterentwickeln ­ Viele Wege führen nach Rom : Entwicklungsetappen von 4 etablierten rheumatologischen Frühversorgungskonzepten in verschiedenen Regionen Deutschlands.

In order to shorten the prognostically relevant waiting time until diagnosis and initiation of appropriate treatment in inflammatory rheumatic diseases, rheumatological centers in many regions across Germany have established and continuously developed specific early care concepts. Evaluated models from Altötting·Burghausen, Berlin Buch, Düsseldorf and Heidelberg and their developmental stages as a response to internal and external challenges are presented in this overview. The transparent publication of the developmental steps and the exchange of experiences aim at promoting new early care concepts in other regions and continuing the joint dialogue for improvement of the early detection and quality of care of inflammatory rheumatic diseases in Germany.

[Rheumatology in German MD curricula]. / Rheumatologie im Medizinstudium.

Transmitting a substantial amount of basic knowledge in Rheumatology to all medical students is essential for the future medical care of patients with rheumatic diseases for two reasons: on the one hand, future general practitioners will need to master the patterns of rheumatic diseases to recognize them fast enough in new-onset patients and to refer them in time and directly to rheumatologists. On the other hand, the shortage of rheumatologists can only then be relieved in the future when we are able to inspire enthusiasm for our specialty. Adequate rheumatological structures are established only in some of the German faculties of medicine. Structural improvements happen in small steps only but were achieved at several sites. The better the local structures, the higher the chances of committed university teachers in rheumatology to reach all medical students. Probably from 2026 onwards, the learning objectives relevant for examinations will be defined by the national competence-based catalogue of learning objectives in medicine (NKLM), which is currently in the final stages of completion together with the German Federal Institute for Medical and Pharmaceutical Examinations (IMPP). It now appears that systemic autoimmune diseases and inflammatory rheumatic diseases are adequately depicted in this catalogue. If this is achieved, students will know more about these diseases in the future and will diagnose them faster in patients. Work on the NKLM is therefore of highest importance. In addition to the work on the learning objectives, up to date learning materials are required, which have to be available throughout Germany. A Rheumatology script just finished by the committee for medical student education of the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh) and now available on the DGRh homepage should close this gap.

[Early recognition and screening consultation: a necessary way to improve early detection and treatment in rheumatology? : Overview of the early recognition and screening consultation models for rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases in Germany]. / Früh- und Screeningsprechstunden: Ein notwendiger Weg zur besseren Frühversorgung in der internistischen Rheumatologie? : Rheumatologische Früh- und Screeningsprechstundenmodelle in Deutschland.

In order to reduce the prognostically relevant time interval between the initial manifestation of a rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease and diagnosis as well as the consecutive initiation of an appropriate treatment, several rheumatological centers in Germany have improved the access to initial rheumatologic evaluation by establishing early recognition/screening clinics at their respective sites. Corresponding models located at Altoetting·Burghausen, Bad Pyrmont, Berlin Buch, Duesseldorf, Heidelberg, Herne, Mannheim as well as supraregional/multicenter initiatives Rheuma Rapid, RhePort and Rheuma-VOR are presented in this overview along with the respective characteristics, potential advantages and disadvantages, but also first evaluation results of several models. The aim of this publication is to promote early detection of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases as one of the most important challenges in current rheumatology by encouraging further rheumatologic centers and practices to launch their own early recognition/screening consultation model on the basis of aspects presented herein.

Power-Doppler perfusion phenotype in RA patients is dependent on anti-citrullinated peptide antibody status, not on rheumatoid factor.

It is not known whether there are any consistent non-serological differences between seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis, and if any, whether they depend upon rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA), or both. In a pilot study, we showed that the two forms could be differentiated using power-Doppler sonography (PDS), and that the difference is ACPA dependent. This extended study explored whether the previous findings could be confirmed. 103 patients 51 ACPA positive (ACPA +), 52 ACPA negative (ACPA -) with active wrist arthritis were examined using PDS. By means of a temporal image series, pulsatility was evaluated over a 3-5-s period, maximum and minimum perfusion signal were determined using a computer program counting the number of coloured pixels for each frame. Maxima (Pmax) and minima (Pmin) were determined, and the standardized peak-to-peak amplitude sA was calculated (sA = (Pmax - Pmin)/Pmax). This parameter was then compared for ACPA + and ACPA- patients. In addition, a multivariate regression was performed, to determine which factors influence sA. sA differed significantly between ACPA + and ACPA- patients [20% (13-26) vs. 41% (32-57), p < 0. 0001]. In the multivariate analysis, age (t = 2.5, p = 0.02) and ACPA status (t = - 4.8, p < 0.0001) were independent predictors of sA. PDS perfusion patterns are different in seropositive and seronegative RA. The difference appears to be ACPA, not RF dependent. This suggests that the underlying pathophysiological process is different in ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA.

Simple screening tools predict death and cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatic disease.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with rheumatic disease (RD) have an increased mortality risk compared with the general population, mainly due to cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to identify patients at high risk of CVD and mortality by comparing three screening tools suitable for clinical practice. METHOD: In this prospective, single-centre study, consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic autoimmune disease (SAI), or spondyloarthritides (SpA) including psoriatic arthritis underwent a comprehensive cardiovascular risk assessment. Patients were predefined as being at high risk for cardiovascular events or death if any of the following were present: European Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) ≥ 3%, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) ≥ 200 pg/mL, or any pathological electrocardiogram pattern. RESULTS: The patient population (n = 764) comprised 352 patients with RA, 260 with SAI, and 152 with SpA. After a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 6.0% of RD patients had died (7.0%, 7.2%, and 1.4% of patients in the RA, SAI, and SpA subgroups), and 5.0% had experienced a cardiovascular event (5.0%, 6.4%, and 2.8%, respectively). For all RD patients and the RA and SAI subgroups, NT-proBNP ≥ 200 pg/mL and SCORE ≥ 3% identified patients with a 3.5-5-fold increased risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular events. Electrocardiogram pathology was associated with increased mortality risk, but not with cardiovascular events. CONCLUSION: NT-proBNP ≥ 200 pg/mL or SCORE ≥ 3% identifies RA and SAI patients with increased risk of cardiovascular events and death. Both tools are suitable as easy screening tools in daily practice to identify patients at risk for further diagnostics and closer long-term follow-up.

[Rheumatology - Integration into student training (RISA) : Current structure of clinical rheumatology in German universities (RISA III)]. / Rheumatologie - Integration in die studentische Ausbildung (RISA) : Zur aktuellen Struktur der internistischen Rheumatologie an deutschen Hochschulen (RISA III).

The German Society of Rheumatology and the Committee for Student Training investigated what effects the structures in university medicine have on student teaching. In February 2014 a questionnaire was sent to the teaching staff and Deans of each of the 37 medical faculties. Of the locations seven were classified as being independent rheumatological university hospitals and nine universities had a W2/W3/C3 grade professor as head of a department of clinical rheumatology but answerable to superiors. In the 37 faculties in Germany the proportion of lecture hours, the proportion of obligatory lecture hours, the number of hours for practical exercises and the number of hours for bedside teaching were distributed very differently and as a rule higher in universities with academic freedom. Not all medical faculties have obligatory teaching in the field of clinical rheumatology. On average medical students see five patients with rheumatological symptoms during their studies. In summary, over the past years it has not been possible to successfully utilize the great importance of rheumatology for society and the innovation potential of this discipline in order to improve the integration of clinical rheumatology into universities.

Screening for latent tuberculosis infection: performance of tuberculin skin test and interferon-γ release assays under real-life conditions.

OBJECTIVES: To characterise optimal screening strategies for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) prior to the initiation of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy. METHODS: Patients in 62 German rheumatology centres were evaluated for LTBI. Each patient was screened with a tuberculin skin test (TST) and one form of an interferon-γ release assay (IGRA), either TSPOT.TB (TSPOT) or Quantiferon TB Gold (QFT). RESULTS: A total of 1529 patients with rheumatological disease were tested with a TST, 844 with TSPOT and 685 with QFT. TST was positive in 11.3% (n=173). The prevalence of LTBI was 8.0% when defined as a positive TST and no previous Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination and 7.9% when based on a positive IGRA. Combining both estimates increased the prevalence of LTBI to 11.1%. Clinical risk factors for LTBI were found in 122 patients (34 with a history of prior TB, 81 close contacts and 27 with suggestive chest x-ray lesions). A compound risk factor (CRF) was defined as the presence of at least one of these three risk factors. Statistical analyses were conducted to examine the association between CRF and LTBI test outcomes. In multivariate analysis, TST was influenced by CRF (OR 6.2; CI 4.08 to 9.44, p<0.001) and BCG vaccination status (OR 2.9; CI 2.00 to 4.35, p<0.001). QFT and TSPOT were only influenced by CRF (QFT: OR 2.6; CI 1.15 to 5.98, p=0.021; TSPOT: OR 8.7; CI 4.83 to 15.82, p<0.001). ORs and the agreement of TST and IGRA test results varied by rheumatological disease. CONCLUSION: LTBI test results in an individual patient need to be considered in the context of prior BCG vaccination and clinical risk factors. In patient populations with low rates of TB incidence and BCG vaccination, the use of both TST and IGRA may maximise sensitivity in detecting LTBI but may also reduce specificity.

[Vaccinations in rheumatology]. / Impfungen in der rheumatologie.

Patients with autoimmune or rheumatic diseases are at increased risk for infectious complications due to immunosuppressive therapy and/or the underlying immunological disease itself. To date, the consistent use of vaccinations in this patient group has been limited due to concerns about flair-ups or lack of efficacy. In prospective studies neither an increased risk of disease flair-ups nor of initiation of autoimmune disorders was found as yet; however, the data is still considered insufficient (small studies including only patients in remission). Vaccination with non-live vaccines can generally be regarded as safe and relatively effective, even in patients on immunosuppressive therapy. Since the immune response to vaccination may be markedly impaired depending on the medication used and the underlying autoimmune disease, monitoring of both serum titers and of patients' vaccination schedules should form an integral part of rheumatological care.

[Systemic lupus erythematosus. A problem based approach]. / Systemischer Lupus erythematodes. Eine problemorientierte Annäherung.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoinflammatory disease of unknown etiology with predominance of the female sex. Clinical criteria as well as immunological characteristics, e. g. autoantibodies, are necessary for diagnosis. The clinical course of SLE is variable and may be characterized by periods of remissions and chronic or acute relapses. New symptoms are often challenging regarding differential diagnosis. This review will discuss symptoms with a problem based approach. Parameters of activity are helpful to differentiate between disease activity and associated problems, e. g. infections. Lupus patients have a 5 times increased mortality compared to the normal population. The main reasons for mortality are infections and cardiovascular events, rather than disease manifestations. Therefore, besides the fast and precise use of immunosuppressants the consequent therapy of co-morbidities is a major issue in dealing with these patients. Cardiovascular risk factors need to be controlled, life style modifications should be started early, and diagnosis and therapy of osteoporosis should not be neglected.

[Cytokines]. / Zytokine.

Cytokine driven inflammation is a common feature in autoimmune diseases. Cytokines are needed under physiological conditions within the innate and adaptive immune systems to control infectious diseases and neoplastic disorders by regulation of the cell cycle and apoptosis. Cytokines can also be found in persistently increased concentrations in inflamed tissues within autoimmune diseases. Therefore, the modulation of cytokines seems to be a worthwhile therapeutic approach. With TNFalpha and Il-1, two key cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis have been identified. Their inhibition leads to a convincing clinical benefit. In the near future, inhibition of additional cytokines, such as Il-6 or Il-15, will likely open new beneficial strategies.

[Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with anticytokines]. / Ein Meilenstein in der Rheumatherapie.

In the hands of an experienced rheumatologist and in adherence to the contraindications named in the article, anticytokines such asTNF-alpha blockers or interleukin-1 antagonists are regarded as relatively reliable, are well tolerated and in many cases, are very effective. Especially when used in combination with methotrexate, they demonstratively lower the disease activity score and significantly slow the radiographic progression.Thus, anticytokines are currently the most effective therapy for RA. An additional advantage compared to conventional DMARD is the rapid onset of action (usually within two to four weeks).TNF-alpha blockers are also presently employed in numerous other chronic inflammatory diseases. The efficacy of anticytokines in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, juvenile arthritis and Crohn's disease has been proven.